Anyone reading the Harry Potter series? (or maybe, is anyone NOT reading the Harry Potter series?)
I started reading them recently, to keep up with my kid. I can highly recommend them. They are imaginative and fun for all ages. They are a good influence on kids. They show children acting like children who are naive but intelligent, and brave when it counts. They are polite, unlike the precocious brats portrayed in American television and movies, where they show a ten year old kid acting like a smartass to adults and everyone laughs. Or the kid in commercials, where Mom just smiles while following her five year old around with a bottle of some miracle cleaner while he's drawing on walls and furniture.
Rowling's kids face bullies, peer pressure, anxiety, prejudice, temptation, just like real kids. In a fantasy setting she can explore these issues in a way that's interesting to children, and the life lessons don't come off all preachy.
Plus it gets kids reading again. My eight-year-old just finished the fourth book. He read it all himself -- all 600+ pages -- and he can tell you all the characters and what they are like and what they went through. He has Playstation and TV and other distractions, but he still likes to read.
As for the writing, she is definitely hitting her stride. The first two were charming but a bit amateurish (they are children's books, after all). The third one was much more involved, and the 4th one was her best so far. I am about halfway through the 5th one, and it is a real page turner. The plot is twisted, and woven with that from previous books. Snowballing sequels.
I wonder if it's going out of scope though. Is she trying to appeal to an older audience now, on purpose?
Although, my kid seems to be following it okay. The point of view never changes (always looking over Harry's shoulder), she keeps the words and sentences short, and finds opportunities to explain things, but the plots are getting more complicated. Then again, one reason kids like these books is they aren't so kiddish.
Re:Harry Potter books
I have to agree with you on HP. SF Amy recommended Harry Potter so strongly that I bought the first one (in paperback) and started reading it. I was hooked.
That evening (I'd spent most of the day with my nose in the book) my husband came home, asked me what I was reading, then read it himself. The following afternoon he went to the bookstore and bought the next three books. We nearly went nuts waiting for Book 5.
Alas, my son isn't quite old enough to start hearing Harry Potter at bedtime--he's still at the age where he would have Voldemort nightmares.
Pohl's Law: A sufficiently advanced form of technology is indistinguishable from magic. Programmer's Corollary: A sufficiently rigged demo is indistinguishable from magic.
Re:Harry Potter books
Depending how old... you may be surprised. I was. My kid doesn't get fazed by scary movies like I did when I was his age (nine). I think kids have become desensitized to violence (bad) and scary stuff (not so bad).
Look at cartoons and family movies and you can see why. Remember when they edited the cartoon violence out of Bugs Bunny? That ain't nothin' compared to Digimon and Dragonball Z, and video games like Mortal Combat.
Interesting note, Warner Bros. put the violence back into Bugs Bunny, but they still won't release the racist episodes. So some censorship is still okay.
I'm not a complete idiot -- some parts are missing.
Re:Harry Potter books
Squirt's only five, and Discovery Channel shows on sharks and vampire bats can still lead to midnight "bed checks", where I have to assure him repeatedly that there is not enough room under his bed, or in his closet, for any nasties to hide...
He's pretty much ruined as far as cartoons go, however. I made the mistake of teaching him the Wagner parody songs from the Looney Tunes' "What's Opera, Doc?" At really inopportune moments he'll let loose with "Kill da wabbit...kill da wabbit!" sung to Ride of the Valkyries.
Pohl's Law: A sufficiently advanced form of technology is indistinguishable from magic. Programmer's Corollary: A sufficiently rigged demo is indistinguishable from magic.